Applicant _______________________________ Mentor ___________________________________
Major __________________________________ Recommender _____________________________
Category |
Evaluation |
Comments |
Introduction and theoretical underpinnings (10 points)
- Discusses the purpose of the study
- Discusses the relevance of the paper
- Captures reader’s attention
|
Excellent (10)
Good (8)
Acceptable (6)
Marginal (4)
Unacceptable (0) |
|
Research question, design and methodology (20 points)
- Research question and hypotheses are clear
- Research method is clear (a literature review; data collection and analysis; a reflective essay; producing a movie or play; creating a piece of artwork; or other creative work)
|
Excellent (20)
Good (16)
Acceptable (12)
Marginal (8)
Unacceptable (0) |
|
Quality of writing (10 points)
- Concise: sentences are well structured and focused
- Clear: words are used accurately and effectively, not too general
- Vocabulary is appropriate for a general audience and for a college-level writing (no slang)
- Bibliography contains an appropriate proportion of academic papers and is carefully cited and referenced
|
Excellent (10)
Good (8)
Acceptable (6)
Marginal (4)
Unacceptable (0) |
|
Ideas and structure (20 points)
- Interesting content, demonstrates sophistication of thought
- Central research question is clearly communicated and explained
- Proposal recognizes complexity of the problem, possible contradictions and limitations
|
Excellent (20)
Good (16)
Acceptable (12)
Marginal (8)
Unacceptable (0) |
|
Feasibility and preparedness of the student (20 points)
- Student clearly communicates challenges of the project
- Activities are reasonable to be accomplished within the outlined time period
- Student possesses knowledge, practice, and skills to succeed in the project
|
Excellent (20)
Good (16)
Acceptable (12)
Marginal (8)
Unacceptable (0) |
|
Quality of recommendations (20 points)
- Mentor is enthusiastic about working with the student
- Mentor is devoting sufficient time to guide the project
- Mentor is sure about the feasibility of the project
- Mentor and recommender believe that the project is worth pursuing
- Recommender is positive about the student
|
Excellent (20)
Good (16)
Acceptable (12)
Marginal (8)
Unacceptable (0) |
|